| Reliability/Uptime | 1.38 | | Technical Support | 1.23 | | Customer Service & Billing | 1.00 | | Server & Network Speed | 1.69 | | Price & Value for Money | 1.73 | | Overall Average | 1.41 |
Reviewed by Stefan IP 64.121.44.254 on May 25, 2011
|
| Rating: |
0.4 (uptime = 0; tech = 0; customer = 0; speed = 1; price = 1) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
The WORST! Down three times in as many months. Lost emails. Have been trying to cancel with no response. |
| Review Period: |
January, 2005 - April, 2011
|
Reviewed by Debunk IP 66.74.40.161 on March 21, 2009
|
| Rating: |
0.4 (uptime = 2; tech = 0; customer = 0; speed = 0; price = 0) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
Worst service ever.
NO OUTGOING MAIL UNLESS YOU USE THEIR WEBMAIL!!??? In 2009!??
Servers are slower than paint drying.
Techs are in India and no phone contact for support. |
| Review Period: |
February, 2000 - March, 2009
|
Reviewed by marc IP 66.173.160.115 on April 7, 2008
|
| Rating: |
3.4 (uptime = 4; tech = 4; customer = 1; speed = 4; price = 4) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
horrible billing department just turns off sites at random and will not reply to emails. Only billing department in a company I have ever found that does not respond to customers heck their own tech department says they cant reach them |
| Review Period: |
September, 2003 - April, 2008
|
Reviewed by Chris IP 206.45.176.215 on March 25, 2008
|
| Rating: |
2.6 (uptime = 1; tech = 3; customer = 2; speed = 3; price = 4) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
Seemed good a few years ago when I first got my account. 2007 saw plenty of downtime, though it was usually resolved in an hour or two. Now I'm constantly getting connection errors in my browser every few minutes. The price sure is right and they offer a |
| Review Period: |
January, 2005 - March, 2008
|
Reviewed by Aaron Wallace IP 158.111.4.26 on December 19, 2007
|
| Rating: |
1 (uptime = 1; tech = 1; customer = 1; speed = 1; price = 1) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
Quite bad. Took forever to transfer from them when i finally quit. |
| Review Period: |
January, 2005 - January, 2007
|
Reviewed by Anyk IP 200.93.135.250 on July 5, 2007
|
| Rating: |
0 (uptime = 0; tech = 0; customer = 0; speed = 0; price = 0) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
WORST HOSTING SERVICE EVER.. used them as a reseller but what a pain !! dont waist your money or time... they delete your accounts, change configs, constantly down, slow response, worst company...cheaper = worst... |
| Review Period: |
January, 2006 - March, 2006
|
Reviewed by Peter lin IP 124.168.83.193 on March 12, 2007
|
| Rating: |
1.4 (uptime = 1; tech = 2; customer = 2; speed = 1; price = 1) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
I just realize that they are really useless |
| Review Period: |
February, 2001 - March, 2007
|
Reviewed by Jeff IP 24.167.89.136 on March 3, 2007
|
| Rating: |
4 (uptime = 4; tech = 4; customer = 4; speed = 4; price = 4) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
Something has changed with eDataRack. Since 2007 started everything has been going great! I think the company must have been sold. I couldn't ask for better service. Thanks, eDataRack. |
| Review Period: |
April, 2005 - March, 2007
|
Reviewed by Alejandro Ozerkovsky IP 64.94.156.3 on February 16, 2007
|
| Rating: |
1.6 (uptime = 1; tech = 1; customer = 1; speed = 3; price = 2) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
Nightmare after nightmare. My website was down constantly (once a month).One time they told me that thunderstoms crashed the hard drive and I lost all my data. They promised $2.95 plan at renewal, but no option and they took my site down email... |
| Review Period: |
July, 2003 - July, 2006
|
Reviewed by Dan IP 70.16.63.249 on September 15, 2006
|
| Rating: |
0.6 (uptime = 1; tech = 0; customer = 0; speed = 2; price = 0) |
| Web Hosting Review: |
There is no value to a web host that crashes, loses all your data, and then says "We didn't lose your data. You did. All you buy from us is the shell." BYE BYE edatarack. You couldn't possibly suck any more than you do. |
| Review Period: |
November, 2005 - September, 2006
|
Review eDataRack.com
|